UX Case Study

Indeed

Indeed

Indeed Profile Reimaginig

Indeed Profile Reimaginig

Mobile Web & Desktop

Overview

Indeed is the world’s largest job search platform, helping millions of people find meaningful work globally. With its extensive database of job listings, resume tools, and company reviews, Indeed simplifies the job search process for users and employers alike. This makes designing for Indeed an exciting challenge, as the platform must be intuitive, scalable, and impactful for diverse audiences worldwide.


Mission: We help people get jobs. Globally. For everyone.


  • 60+ Countries and 28 Languages

  • 250M+ Monthly Unique Visitors

  • Leading Platform for Job Seekers and Employers

Role & Duration

Sr. UX/UI Designer (Full-Time)

Oct 2022 - Aug 2024


Product Team:

Danielle Papermaster - Senior Product Manager
Saachi Kudtarkar - Product Manager

Dana Langseth - Sr. UX Reseacrher
Emma Zigarovich - UX Reseacrher

Ashley Zelaya - Sr. UX Content Designer
Alexander Luo - Sr. Software Engineer

My Role

At Indeed, I applied Human-Centered Design principles to tackle complex challenges, create scalable solutions, and deliver meaningful, user-focused experiences. I led strategic initiatives to enhance user engagement, simplify workflows, and ensure seamless scalability across web and mobile platforms.


In more detail, I was involved in the design and execution of several high-impact projects. I lead large domains such as:

Privacy Control Update: Led the full design cycle, including market analysis, prototyping, and QA, enabling access to 144M+ non-resume customer profiles.

Profile Enhancement Initiative: Directed UX design to improve data quality for 245M platform users, significantly advancing the platform’s core strategy.

AI-Driven Solutions: Spearheaded AI integration into customer profiles, collaborating with cross-functional teams to develop award-winning solutions that improved user engagement.

Taxonomy Optimization: Quadrupled taxonomy attribute overlaps between jobs and resumes while increasing attribute extraction by 75%, strengthening platform competitiveness.


Applied Skills: Design Thinking, User Journey Mapping, Wireframing, Prototyping, Usability Testing, UX and Visual Design, AI Integration, Design Systems, and Scalability Design.

Final Result

If you’re short on time, here’s a quick overview of the main milestones, which are detailed further in the UX case. You can also click the link below to dive straight into the solutions and results for each milestone.

Background:
Previous Design

Background:
Previous Design

Milestone #1:
Privacy Control Work

Milestone #1:
Privacy Control Work

Milestone #2:
Profile Reimagining

Milestone #2:
Profile Reimagining

UX Research

Primary User Group:

As a UX/UI Designer, I believe UX research is the foundation for crafting impactful design solutions. Understanding our two core user groups—Job Seekers and Employers—is essential when designing for Indeed.

Job Seekers (left): Individuals actively exploring new job opportunities, seeking tools to simplify and streamline their search.

Employers (right): Hiring managers or recruiters aiming to efficiently discover and connect with the right talent.


Through in-depth exploration of the needs, pain points, and behaviors of each group, I strive to create a product that addresses their unique challenges while delivering a seamless and valuable experience for both sides.

J.D. Power’s Customer Service Index Study Shows Necessary Investment in Support & Service

The Study:

Surveyed 63,000 registered owners and lessees of 2018 to 2020 model-year vehicles.


The study examines customer satisfaction with maintenance and repair service.


Porsche (899/1,000) ranks highest in satisfaction among premium brands, followed by Lexus (895), Infiniti (887), Cadillac (883), and Lincoln (872).


The Insights:

  1. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with service:

    • “Not only are their vehicles more difficult to service than traditional ICE vehicles, but also the lower frequency of visits means dealers have fewer chances to make a positive impression on these customers.”


  2. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with maintenance than repairs:

    • “BEV owners are 2.5 times more likely to not experience their service completed right the first time.”


  3. All generations surveyed showed a preference for internet scheduling:

    • Satisfaction is 75 points higher (out of 1,000) among customers who have an all-digital experience compared to all-analog.

    • Respondents prefer scheduling service via the internet and text messages rather than by phone.

    • 34% of customers prefer to communicate via text message, yet this only happens 9% of the time.


  4. Dealers influence how owners feel about the value of technology:

    • Without dealer education, owners often do not fully understand the technology and its value, presenting a challenge for overall acceptance.

    • Owners are more than twice as likely to learn about their vehicle technology from an outside source (71%) than from a dealer (30%).


Sources:

1: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-customer-service-index-csi-study
2: https://www.guideautoweb.com/en/articles/49836/top-car-brands-for-customer-service-in-2019-according-to-j-d.-power/
3: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-us-tech-experience-index-txi-study


Primary Persona:

Since I focused on the Job Seeker side of the product, this case study will dive deeper into this persona to better understand their challenges and needs.


Here’s a summary of the primary Job Seeker persona, Max, a Warehouse Worker:

About Max: Proactive and eager to advance his career, Max is looking for tools and support to help him stand out and connect with the right opportunities.

Goals: Max wants to optimize his Indeed profile to effectively showcase his skills.

Frustrations: He finds it challenging to differentiate himself from other applicants.


This persona highlights the key motivations and obstacles faced by job seekers like Max, guiding design decisions to address their needs effectively.

J.D. Power’s Customer Service Index Study Shows Necessary Investment in Support & Service

The Study:

Surveyed 63,000 registered owners and lessees of 2018 to 2020 model-year vehicles.


The study examines customer satisfaction with maintenance and repair service.


Porsche (899/1,000) ranks highest in satisfaction among premium brands, followed by Lexus (895), Infiniti (887), Cadillac (883), and Lincoln (872).


The Insights:

  1. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with service:

    • “Not only are their vehicles more difficult to service than traditional ICE vehicles, but also the lower frequency of visits means dealers have fewer chances to make a positive impression on these customers.”


  2. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with maintenance than repairs:

    • “BEV owners are 2.5 times more likely to not experience their service completed right the first time.”


  3. All generations surveyed showed a preference for internet scheduling:

    • Satisfaction is 75 points higher (out of 1,000) among customers who have an all-digital experience compared to all-analog.

    • Respondents prefer scheduling service via the internet and text messages rather than by phone.

    • 34% of customers prefer to communicate via text message, yet this only happens 9% of the time.


  4. Dealers influence how owners feel about the value of technology:

    • Without dealer education, owners often do not fully understand the technology and its value, presenting a challenge for overall acceptance.

    • Owners are more than twice as likely to learn about their vehicle technology from an outside source (71%) than from a dealer (30%).


Sources:

1: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-customer-service-index-csi-study
2: https://www.guideautoweb.com/en/articles/49836/top-car-brands-for-customer-service-in-2019-according-to-j-d.-power/
3: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-us-tech-experience-index-txi-study

Users Problems

The Problem

Key Challenges for Job Seekers on Indeed

Through research and interviews, we uncovered three primary pain points faced by job seekers:

1. Showcase identity beyond a resume: Job seekers want to highlight their skills and experiences without being confined to a traditional resume format. For example, nurses or babysitters may want to share a video to showcase their personality and abilities, helping employers see who they really are beyond the resume.

2. Get hired without a resume: Many users seek alternative ways to apply for jobs when a resume isn’t readily available. For instance, truck drivers often don’t need a traditional resume; instead, their truck driving license can be enough to start working.

3. Stand out from the competition: Differentiating themselves from other candidates remains a significant challenge for many job seekers.


Addressing these challenges was important to enhancing the job seeker experience, as the current system often limits visibility and can be particularly difficult to navigate for users without a resume.

Key Challenges for Employers on Indeed

Through research and interviews on the employer side, we identified three primary challenges they face:

1. Finding high-quality candidates: Hiring managers often struggle to find applicants who meet their qualifications. For example, Ethan, a hiring manager, shared, “I’m struggling to find candidates who truly meet the qualifications and experience we need. I need more high-quality applicants.” This highlights the need for improved filtering tools to connect employers with the best candidates.

2. Reducing bias during hiring: Ensuring fair hiring practices is a major concern. John expressed, “We want to ensure a fair hiring process, but it’s difficult to reduce unconscious bias without the right tools.” Employers need features that focus on skills and qualifications to help mitigate bias and promote fair evaluations.

3. Understanding candidate fit: Employers often find it difficult to determine if a candidate is the right match. As Nick explained, “It’s hard to quickly tell if a candidate is the right fit for the job just by looking at their resume. I need more clarity on their suitability.” Tools that provide deeper insights into candidates beyond their resumes can address this challenge.


Understanding these challenges helps us design solutions that enable employers to find high-quality talent while ensuring a fair and informed hiring process.

Job Seeker and Employer Needs

To summarize the key needs of both job seekers and employers:

Job Seekers: Their main priority is to be noticed by employers and recruiters. Many express frustration when their profiles or resumes get lost among countless candidates. They want their skills, experience, and potential to stand out and attract the attention of hiring managers.

Employers: They need access to a wide talent pool to find the best candidates. However, it’s not just about volume; they also want an efficient system to filter candidates and identify who is the best fit for their roles.


This underscores a core challenge: bridging the gap between job seekers striving to showcase their abilities and employers aiming to quickly and effectively identify top-quality talent.

Background

The Profile on Indeed has traditionally revolved around creating or uploading a resume that job seekers could use for applications and mark as “searchable” for employers. However, as the platform evolved and new features were added to support job seekers throughout their journey, we began collecting richer information about job seekers beyond just their resumes. Unfortunately, this additional information was not accessible to employers. To address this gap, the first step toward reimagining the Indeed Profile was improving the Privacy Control feature.

Why Focus on Privacy Control?


The existing Privacy Control feature was buried under several clicks, making it difficult for job seekers to find and manage. My goal was to redesign the feature to make it more prominent and intuitive, placing it at a higher level within the profile interface. This would enable job seekers to easily control their privacy settings while understanding that these settings impact their entire profile—not just their resume.

Challenge 1

Profile Team Alignment


The first challenge I faced was aligning with the Profile Team. Indeed was the largest tech company I had worked with, and navigating cross-team collaboration within such a complex organization was a new experience for me.


This alignment was crucial as it allowed me to work closely with different stakeholders, unify diverse ideas, and ensure a seamless, consistent user experience across the product. The diagram below illustrates my collaboration chart, showcasing the cross-team collaboration within the Profile Team.

Toward a Proof of Concept:
Customer Support and Service Storymap

To help understand the functionality of the product and the ways to use it, a team of three people (myself, another designer, and a product manager) developed a storymap.

Design Explorations:
1st Round

Initial Focus:

The first step toward achieving the profile vision was simplifying navigation by flattening the profile structure.


Goal:

Enable employers to discover more job seekers on Indeed by improving profile visibility:

• Make new and existing resumes searchable.

• Allow job seekers to see and control their profile status (searchable/private).

• Clearly communicate to job seekers what employers can view on their profiles.


Research:

In the first round of research, we assessed user reactions to different “Privacy Control” designs.


Design Iterations:


Design 1:

Pros: Highly noticeable within the profile layout.

Cons: Consumes too much vertical space, which users found visually overwhelming.

Interview Metrics:

30% of users liked its visibility.

60% found it cluttered and felt it occupied excessive space.


Design 2:

Pros: Clear status indicators for profile visibility and job-seeking activity.

Cons: Similar vertical space concerns as Design 1, with limited compactness.

Interview Metrics:

40% of users appreciated the intuitive toggles.

50% felt the layout could be more streamlined.


Design 3 (Winner):

Pros: Compact and space-efficient, featuring expandable options for detailed settings, making it noticeable to most job seekers.

Cons: Users needed to click for additional details, reducing immediate visibility.

Interview Metrics:

70% of users preferred its clean, concise layout.

20% desired more upfront information.


Summary:

The 1st round of design explorations provided key insights into user preferences, helping us refine the balance between visibility and usability in privacy controls.

Toward a Proof of Concept:
Customer Support and Service Storymap

To help understand the functionality of the product and the ways to use it, a team of three people (myself, another designer, and a product manager) developed a storymap.

Design Explorations:
2nd Round

Addressing Job Seeker Concerns


To address job seekers’ feedback from the 1st round—specifically their desire for more upfront information—I created additional design iterations featuring banners that explained what “Let employers find you” means.


Design Iterations:


Design A:

Pros: The banner was immediately noticeable to 100% of users.

Cons: Despite its visibility, most users ignored the content due to “banner blindness.”

Interview Metrics:

100% of users noticed the banner.

80% admitted they didn’t read the content or assumed it was an ad.


Design B:

Pros: Included clear action steps with interactive buttons, encouraging user engagement.

Cons: The color choices were less effective in grabbing attention compared to Design A.

Interview Metrics:

60% of users understood the call-to-action.

Only 30% found it engaging enough to explore further.


Design C (Winner):

Pros: A compact design and strategic placement of the note significantly improved user awareness. Users noticed and understood the message better than in Designs A and B.

Cons: Some users misinterpreted the blue color as signaling a “complete” or “correct” status, leading them to believe no further action was needed.

Interview Metrics:

75% of users noticed and read the note effectively, making it the most successful design for visibility and comprehension.


Key Insight:


Although Design C was the most effective overall, a subset of users mistakenly assumed that the blue color indicated no further action was required. This highlighted the need for clear visual cues that prompt users to take the desired actions.

Final Design

Addressing Color Concerns


To tackle the blue color misinterpretation from previous research, my final step was to explore alternative colors for status indicators. I implemented green to signify a public profile that is searchable by employers and orange for a private profile. This color distinction helped users immediately differentiate between the two statuses and provided instant visual feedback without requiring them to read additional details.


Final Design Recap


Issues with Previous Design:

• The “Privacy Control” feature was hidden under the three-dot menu.

• Privacy settings affected only the resume, not the entire profile.

• An additional level created unnecessary clicks for the user.

• Many job seekers were unaware of the control since it was buried two clicks away.


Improvements in the Final Design:

Visibility: The “Employers can find you” status was moved to a prominent position, making it instantly noticeable to job seekers.

Simplicity: Reduced the number of clicks required to access and adjust key privacy settings.

Clarity: Implemented clear color indicators (green and orange) for immediate status recognition, enhancing user experience.


❌ The "Privacy Control" feature is hidden under the three-dot button.

❌ Privacy settings affect the resume only and not the entire profile.


❌ An extra level adds an unnecessary click for the user.


❌ Many job seekers were unaware of this control as it was buried two clicks away.

Before

After


✅ Visibility: Moved the "Employers can find you" status to a more prominent position, making it immediately noticeable to job seekers.

✅ Simplicity: Reduced the number of clicks needed to access key settings.

Impact

Success Metrics

Improvement: +20 percentage points in Feature Adoption Rate post-redesign.

Impact: Expanded employer access to 144 million additional profiles, enabling more comprehensive and targeted talent searches.

Scalability: Unlocked 245 million data points, empowering job seekers to better showcase their qualifications and attract relevant opportunities.

Efficiency: Simplified 10 key user flows in the job seeker journey, reducing friction and enhancing navigation for a smoother experience.

Users Problems

Transition to the Next Milestone: Profile Reimagining


After enhancing the Privacy Control, the next step was to focus on the broader milestone: Profile Reimagining. While the Privacy Control was made more visible and accessible, the underlying infrastructure and data usage remained unchanged, leaving many of the original challenges unresolved.


Job Seeker Challenges:


Limited Representation: Job seekers could only showcase their abilities through their resumes.


Underutilized Data: Additional information, such as qualifications and job preferences, was not fully leveraged to represent them comprehensively.


Lack of Visibility: Job seekers wanted greater transparency into how their profiles were presented to employers.


Employer Challenges:


Insufficient Details: Employers needed more detailed information about job seekers beyond their resumes to make informed hiring decisions.


Time-Consuming Screening: Employers spent excessive time screening candidates to gather additional information that could have been provided upfront.


By addressing these challenges, the goal of Profile Reimagining was to create a more comprehensive and efficient experience for both job seekers and employers.

J.D. Power’s Customer Service Index Study Shows Necessary Investment in Support & Service

The Study:

Surveyed 63,000 registered owners and lessees of 2018 to 2020 model-year vehicles.


The study examines customer satisfaction with maintenance and repair service.


Porsche (899/1,000) ranks highest in satisfaction among premium brands, followed by Lexus (895), Infiniti (887), Cadillac (883), and Lincoln (872).


The Insights:

  1. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with service:

    • “Not only are their vehicles more difficult to service than traditional ICE vehicles, but also the lower frequency of visits means dealers have fewer chances to make a positive impression on these customers.”


  2. Battery-electric vehicle owners are less satisfied with maintenance than repairs:

    • “BEV owners are 2.5 times more likely to not experience their service completed right the first time.”


  3. All generations surveyed showed a preference for internet scheduling:

    • Satisfaction is 75 points higher (out of 1,000) among customers who have an all-digital experience compared to all-analog.

    • Respondents prefer scheduling service via the internet and text messages rather than by phone.

    • 34% of customers prefer to communicate via text message, yet this only happens 9% of the time.


  4. Dealers influence how owners feel about the value of technology:

    • Without dealer education, owners often do not fully understand the technology and its value, presenting a challenge for overall acceptance.

    • Owners are more than twice as likely to learn about their vehicle technology from an outside source (71%) than from a dealer (30%).


Sources:

1: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-customer-service-index-csi-study
2: https://www.guideautoweb.com/en/articles/49836/top-car-brands-for-customer-service-in-2019-according-to-j-d.-power/
3: https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2021-us-tech-experience-index-txi-study

Challenge 2

Data Merging Challenge


A major UX transformation focused on consolidating all job seeker data collected on Indeed, along with the information from the “Indeed Resume” section, into a unified, comprehensive profile—referred to as the Profile Superset.


Hypothesis


By centralizing the management and presentation of all user data, job seekers will be empowered to enhance their profiles, providing a more complete and impactful representation of themselves to employers.

Solution

Data Merge Alignment Process


While engineers focused on the technical backend of data merging, I proactively developed a detailed “Data Merge Flowchart” to ensure clarity and consistency. This flowchart mapped out all possible merge scenarios, tailored specifically to sections of the Indeed Profile.


Examples of Data Merge Scenarios:

1. Work Experience Misalignment:

• Titles differ, dates don’t align, and an existing experience entry is already present in the Indeed resume.

2. Education Inconsistencies:

• Titles and schools match, but one data set lacks date information.

3. Language Proficiency Discrepancies:

• Languages match, but proficiency levels do not align.


This approach bridged gaps between backend operations and user-centric design, minimizing errors and enhancing the user experience.

Result:

1. I documented 15 sections in total, with a primary focus on 5 key sections, identifying 12 potential data merge scenarios.

2. The comprehensive documentation improved efficiency by streamlining communication, minimizing the need for frequent meetings with engineers, and ensuring seamless alignment among all stakeholders.

Challenge 3

Consistency Between Profile ↔ Employers


The next challenge in my work was ensuring a consistent user experience across various flows and departments, which proved to be difficult, especially when different teams managed distinct aspects of the user interface.


At the time I began working on the Profile Reimagining Product, resumes were the primary data source for our sourcing products. Job seekers who didn’t upload a resume on Indeed remained unreachable, limiting the availability of candidates for employers.


Goal

The goal was to expand the pool of available candidates by incorporating job seekers without resumes into sourcing workflows on the employer’s side.

Solution

External Partnership Collaboration


To achieve the goal, I initiated an organizational alignment process. As part of the Profile Department, my team held monthly meetings with the Apply, Enterprise, and Small Employers teams. These meetings ensured alignment and provided an opportunity to share our vision, enabling these teams to anticipate Profile changes and begin shaping their strategy for the Employer side.


Simultaneously, I collaborated with Principal and Staff Designers to ensure my designs followed the correct strategic direction. This collaboration allowed me to refine my work and address any potential gaps in my design approach.

Challenge 4

First-Time Profile Visit Issue


We needed to validate this UX shift with job seekers to understand how they would respond to a significant change in how their information was managed and displayed. The problem was that job seekers’ data was collected from various sources, but they didn’t know where it was stored, which data represented them, or how to update it.

The solution was to educate job seekers during the initial data merge about their new Profile, which was designed to provide transparency and control.

Automatic Data Merge: Data from multiple sources was automatically consolidated into a single profile, eliminating the need for users to manually merge it.
Ease of Management: Job seekers were empowered to review and adjust the merged data in one central place, ensuring accuracy and reducing effort.

This approach prioritized simplicity and user clarity while addressing frustrations with data management.

Solution

Next, I address the challenge of ensuring job seekers understand and interact with their new Profile, which consolidates and highlights merged data from multiple sources. The goal was to create a design solution that not only educated users about this significant change but also provided a clear, intuitive way to review and manage their data.


Below, I showcase my visual design explorations for this solution, focusing on how to best highlight the newly merged data. After thorough testing and feedback, Design 3 emerged as the winner, striking the right balance between clarity, usability, and engagement for job seekers.

Final
RITE Study Research

The Rapid Iterative Testing and Evaluation (RITE) method was crucial in addressing usability challenges quickly and effectively. RITE focuses on evaluating a solution to usability problems multiple times in a rapid, iterative manner. This approach not only identifies usability issues but also allows us to react swiftly and test new solutions. The ultimate outcome of a RITE study is an experience that has been thoroughly usability tested, providing high confidence in its readiness for shipping. This minimizes uncertainty about whether a proposed solution will meet user needs.

Why RITE?

The tight project timeline required a method like RITE to deliver rapid iterations, ensure usability, and confidently move forward with solutions within limited time constraints.

My Contributions

I designed the Profile User Flows Diagram: I created this as part of the MVP UX Proposal for the Profile Experience, ensuring alignment and collaboration with teams such as RCS, JSU, and others. Also this documentation helped to collaborate with engineers and helped them on building a live-data prototype.


This initiative aimed to establish a cohesive profile experience that enables job seekers to effortlessly manage their information and understand their visibility to employers and job matching on Indeed.

As results Qual Metrics Measured with UXR:

✅ Increased understanding in the value/purpose of a Profile

✅ Ease of use—job seekers can find and keep their data up to date


Final Design

Owner’s Manual Digitalization

For the entire Digital Help Center project, the development of the Digital Owner’s Manual was set as a priority. It was intended to be a text document with a clear hierarchy and navigation. Therefore, it was decided that its content should be placed on the center screen of the CID inside the car.

Impact

Success Metrics

After identifying user issues, I began improving the OM navigation by trying different navigation layouts on our product.

Based in Mountain View, CA

Portfolio © 2025